Academics "fighting" over an old series of photos by Burrell. :)
Anyway, it is claimed by some that the photo of the thylacine with a chicken in its mouth is that of a stuffed animal.
I dont believe it for a minute.
It must have been the finest taxidermist in Australia at the time to have done that specimen.
Check out the other photos from the same compound/cage.
Are they all of different stuffed animals.?
The "argument"/Rhetorical questions is here